Development and Validation of a Renal Replacement after Trauma Scoring Tool.

BACKGROUND: Stress on the healthcare system requires careful allocation of resources such as renal replacement therapy (RRT). The COVID-19 pandemic generated difficulty securing access to RRT for trauma patients. We sought to develop a renal replacement after trauma (RAT) scoring tool to help identify trauma patients who may require RRT during their hospitalization. STUDY DESIGN: The 2017 to 2020 TQIP database was divided into a derivation (2017 to 2018 data) and validation (2019 to 2020 data) set. A 3-step methodology was used. Adult trauma patients admitted from the emergency department to the operating room or ICU were included. Patients with chronic kidney disease, transfers from another hospital, and emergency department death were excluded. Multiple logistic regression models were created to determine the risk for RRT in trauma patients. The weighted average and relative impact of each independent predictor was used to derive a RAT score, which was validated using area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC). RESULTS: From 398,873 patients in the derivation and 409,037 patients in the validation set, 11 independent predictors of RRT were included in the RAT score derived with scores ranging from 0 to 11. The AUROC for the derivation set was 0.85. The rate of RRT increased to 1.1%, 3.3%, and 20% at scores of 6, 8, and 10, respectively. The validation set AUROC was 0.83. CONCLUSIONS: RAT is a novel and validated scoring tool to help predict the need for RRT in trauma patients. With future improvements including baseline renal function and other variables, the RAT tool may help prepare for the allocation of RRT machines/staff during times of limited resources.

Evaluation of the effects of repeated disinfection on medical exam gloves: Part 2. Changes in mechanical properties.

Many healthcare professionals have been forced, under acute shortages, to extend medical exam gloves beyond their intended single use. Despite limited available literature, the CDC proposed a set of guidelines for repeated exam gloves use, indicating a maximum number of treatments for three widely available disinfectants. This study examines how these treatments affect the mechanical properties of latex and nitrile gloves. Furthermore, an acceptability threshold is proposed for changes in tensile property, specifically elastic modulus, as an indication of degradation. This proposed criterion was also applied to similar studies available in the literature to determine applicability and aid in recommendation development. Three different latex glove brands and three nitrile brands were exposed to repeated treatments of an alcohol-based hand rub, diluted bleach, or soap and water. Tensile tests of samples cut from untreated and treated gloves were performed to assess the change in elastic modulus induced by each treatment. The findings suggest that latex gloves performed well within the CDC recommended guidelines of six repeated treatments for an ethanol-based hand rub and 10 repeated treatments of either dilute bleach or soap and water. Nitrile exam gloves, on the other hand, showed significant changes in elastic modulus, with more inconclusive results among brands. This was especially true for treatment with dilute bleach and soap and water. Further research is needed to investigate the effects of disinfection products on the mechanical integrity of nitrile exam gloves. The results support the use of five repeated treatments of ethanol-based hand rub for nitrile exam gloves, a lower threshold than currently recommended by the CDC. This research also supports that the CDC recommendation of 10 repeated treatment with soap and water is appropriate for latex exam gloves, but not for nitrile exam gloves. Occupational safety and health professionals involved in the selection of disposable exam gloves for infection control should consider the compatibility of the glove polymer type with available disinfectants, especially if extended use with repeated disinfection becomes necessary.

Evaluation of the effects of repeated disinfection on medical exam gloves: Part 1. Changes in physical integrity.

COVID-19 has created shortages of personal protective equipment. In resource-constrained situations, limited cycles of disinfection and extended use of gloves is recommended by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to conserve supplies. However, these guidelines are based on limited evidence. In this study, serial cycles of hand hygiene were performed on gloved hands using an ethanol-based hand rub (six and 10 cycles), 0.1% sodium hypochlorite (bleach) solution (10 cycles), or soap and water (10 cycles) on latex and nitrile medical exam gloves from the United States and India. A modified water-leak test evaluated glove integrity after repeated applications of these disinfecting agents. When aggregated, dilute bleach demonstrated the lowest difference between treatment and control arms: -2.5 percentage points (95% CI: -5.3 to 0.3) for nitrile, 0.6 percentage points (95% CI: -2.6 to 3.8) for non-powdered latex. For U.S.-purchased gloves tested with six and 10 applications of ethanol-based hand rub, the mean difference in failure risk between treatment and control gloves was within the prespecified non-inferiority margin of five percentage points or less, though some findings were inconclusive since outside the margin. The aggregated difference in failure risk between treatment and control was 3.5 percentage points (0.6 to 6.4) for soap and water, and 2.3 percentage points (-0.5 to 5.0) and 5.0 percentage points (1.8 to 8.2) for 10 and 6 applications of ethanol-based hand rub, respectively. Most leaks occurred in the interdigital webs (35%) and on the fingers (34%). This indicates that some combinations of glove types and disinfection methods may allow for extended use. Ten applications of dilute bleach solution had the least impact on glove integrity. However, the majority of glove and exposure combinations were inconclusive. Additional testing of specific glove and disinfectant combinations may inform future strategies to guide extended use during glove shortages. Additional considerations, not evaluated here, include duration of use, disinfectant chemical permeation, and the effects of hand temperature, movement, and manipulation of instruments on glove integrity.